In the application of CC-Link fieldbus, the most critical aspect is the communication initialization setup. There are currently three primary methods for initializing CC-Link communication. This paper aims to compare and analyze these methods to determine which one is the simplest and most effective under different scenarios. Understanding these methods holds significant practical value in real-world engineering applications. It helps reduce design workload and save time while maintaining quality, and also opens up potential for further development and utilization of CC-Link technology.
To facilitate the comparison of communication initialization settings, a small-scale CC-Link fieldbus system was established in the laboratory. The overall system configuration is illustrated in Figure 1. After ensuring the hardware connections are correct, the communication initialization process can begin.
There are three main methods for setting up communication parameters. The first method involves programming to set the communication initialization parameters. As shown in Figure 2, the process includes writing key parameters such as the number of connected modules, retry count, auto-return module settings, and CPU operation specifications into memory addresses. Once the refresh instruction is executed, the buffer memory parameters are sent to the internal registration area, initiating the data link. If the data link starts successfully, the parameters can be registered to E2PROM using a register command. This ensures that the settings persist even after power is turned off. However, if the parameters are incorrect—such as mismatched with the hardware or settings—the data link may fail without clear error messages, requiring manual troubleshooting.
The second method uses GX-Configurator software to configure CC-Link communication. This software allows users to set up the master station, add slave stations, and define their models and addresses. The configuration screen displays all module information clearly. However, after configuration, there was an issue where the data link failed upon PLC reset. Although the software prompts whether to execute the data link, it does not write the configuration directly to E2PROM. Therefore, a separate program must be used to write the parameters to E2PROM, adding an extra step but simplifying the process compared to manual programming.
The third method involves setting communication parameters through network parameters, a feature available only on the Q series PLC. By configuring the network parameters in GPPW software, remote I/O signals can be automatically refreshed to the CPU memory, and the initial CC-Link settings can be applied automatically. This method is efficient and reduces the need for complex programming. However, it lacks detailed control over the internal operations of the PLC, making it more abstract compared to the other methods.
Each method has its own strengths and weaknesses. Programming offers full control and understanding of the system, ideal for beginners learning CC-Link. Configuration software provides a user-friendly interface, saving time but lacking E2PROM support. Network parameter setup is efficient and reliable, but limited to specific PLC models.
In conclusion, each method serves different purposes depending on the user's needs and the type of PLC being used. For those seeking deep insight into the PLC's operation, programming is the best choice. For efficiency and ease of use, network parameter setup is highly recommended. Overall, the network parameter method stands out as the most convenient and effective for practical applications, significantly reducing setup and debugging time. As fieldbus technology continues to evolve, future communication settings will likely become even more advanced and user-friendly.
Light Binning,Fiber Optic Splitter Box,Diy Beam Splitter Box,Standard Beam Splitter Boxes
Shenzhen Jingtu Cabinet Network Equipment Co., LTD , https://www.jingtujigui.com